AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and AMD Radeon R9 380X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 580

AMD Radeon R9 380X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 970 MHz
Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
Around 55% better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 190 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
7x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 970 MHz
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 6224
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 667
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 vs 9685
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 vs 9685

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 19 November 2015
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 970 MHz
Texture fill rate	193.0 GTexel / s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 2048
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 190 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6780 MHz vs 970 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753 vs 6224
PassMark - G2D Mark	943 vs 667
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10113 vs 9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10113 vs 9685

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X

Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2900
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2900

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7753

6224

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

943

667

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10113

9685

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2900

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10113

9685

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2900

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3361

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 580	AMD Radeon R9 380X
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753	6224
PassMark - G2D Mark	943	667
Geekbench - OpenCL	40070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	117.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10113	9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2900	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10113	9685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2900	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3053

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 580	AMD Radeon R9 380X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Polaris 20	Antigua
Launch date	5 June 2017	19 November 2015
Place in performance rating	311	313
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$229
Price now		$528.44
Value for money (0-100)		15.61
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	970 MHz
Core clock speed	1100 MHz
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops	3,973 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2304	2048
Texture fill rate	193.0 GTexel / s	124.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	190 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	5,000 million
Compute units		32
Stream Processors		2048
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	221 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB / s	182.4 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 bit
Memory clock speed	6780 MHz	970 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore