AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- 1459.5x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35732 vs 30399
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 402
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35732 vs 30399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 402 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3643
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3643
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7824 vs 7540
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3643 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7824 vs 7540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35732 | 30399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 402 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 7824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP106 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 358 | 361 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |