AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 57.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 179.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- 9x more pipelines: 2x 2304 vs 512
- 9546.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,728 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 16392 MB vs 4 GB
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 179.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2304 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,728 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 16392 MB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2729 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11659 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1199 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Ellesmere | Lexa |
| Launch date | 24 April 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $79 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 874 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,728 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 2304 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 179.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,200 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 305 mm | 145 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 16392 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2x 224.0 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris with others
AMDRadeon Pro Duo Polaris vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
AMDRadeon Pro Duo Polaris vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
AMDRadeon Pro Duo Polaris vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
