AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1530 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 230 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13220 vs 13044
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13220 vs 13044
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 7164
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 7164
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 30936
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 30936

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Dec 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Boost clock speed	1600 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13220 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13220 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642 vs 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642 vs 30936

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 525
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13047 vs 12258
Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69530 vs 62815

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	769 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark	13047 vs 12258
Geekbench - OpenCL	69530 vs 62815

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

525

769

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12258

13047

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

30936

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

30936

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

62815

69530

Name	AMD Radeon Pro V520	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark	525	769
PassMark - G3D Mark	12258	13047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13220	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13220	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642	30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642	30936
Geekbench - OpenCL	62815	69530
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro V520	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 5.0
Code name	Navi 12	Vega 10
Launch date	1 Dec 2020	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	68	120
Type	Server	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999
Value for money (0-100)		13.37
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1600 MHz	1530 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	460.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	14.75 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.373 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304
Pixel fill rate	102.4 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	230.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	230 Watt
Transistor count		12,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	111 mm (4.4 inches)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)	2000 MHz
Memory type	HBM2