AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro V520

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 3717
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 3717
11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3357
11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3357

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Dec 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1600 MHz
14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 525
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 12258
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 13220
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 13220
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 61570

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1440 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	791 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark	18872 vs 12258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19571 vs 13220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19571 vs 13220
Geekbench - OpenCL	74179 vs 61570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

525

791

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12258

18872

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

19571

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

19571

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

3357

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

61570

74179

Name	AMD Radeon Pro V520	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G2D Mark	525	791
PassMark - G3D Mark	12258	18872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13220	19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13220	19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642	3357
Geekbench - OpenCL	61570	74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1534.582
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		13943

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro V520	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 12	TU102
Launch date	1 Dec 2020	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	61	112
Type	Server	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$6,299
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1600 MHz	1770 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1440 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	460.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	14.75 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.373 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304
Pixel fill rate	102.4 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	230.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count		18,600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
Width	111 mm (4.4 inches)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	HBM2