AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs AMD Radeon Pro 575
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and AMD Radeon Pro 575 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 120 Watt
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 5 June 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34778 vs 26775
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 vs 8311
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2814 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1663
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 vs 8311
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2814 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34778 vs 26775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 vs 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 vs 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 575
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon Pro 575 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5040 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26775 | 34778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega 12 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 489 | 490 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1096 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 120 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 6800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |