AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 342.9x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26775 vs 20720
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26775 vs 20720 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6317 vs 5300
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 558
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 8311
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1663
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 8311
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1663
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6317 vs 5300 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 648 vs 558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 8311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 8311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 | 6317 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 558 | 648 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26775 | 20720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 2337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Vega 12 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 481 | 483 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 145 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 7 GB/s |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
ATIFireGL V3350
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7650 GS
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100
