AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 580 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2

• 7.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 302.4 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 3584
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 2x 5,120 gflops vs 9,677 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
• 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1572 MHz
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.128 vs 11.901

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1 GPU 2

11.901 21.128

Compare specifications (specs)