AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and AMD Radeon RX Vega videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12822 vs 2094
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 2391
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12822 vs 2094
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2017 vs 1 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1138 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 12297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12822 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12822 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 2391 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 9,677 gflops
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 828
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67957 vs 61544
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.048 vs 153.117
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3986.188 vs 1722.138
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.975 vs 11.901
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.468 vs 126.528
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1291.445 vs 1172.788
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 3353
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s vs 302.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3584 |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops vs 9,677 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 828 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67957 vs 61544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 vs 153.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 vs 1722.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.975 vs 11.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 vs 126.528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 vs 1172.788 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 | 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61544 | 67957 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 153.117 | 205.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.138 | 3986.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.901 | 17.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 | 215.468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 | 1291.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12822 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12822 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 8455 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.3 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Greenland |
Launch date | 14 August 2017 | 1 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $599.99 |
Place in performance rating | 249 | 252 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1138 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | 9,830 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel / s | 307.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB / s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |