AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1076 MHz
- 3986.5x more texture fill rate: 377.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13123 vs 10251
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13123 vs 10251
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3316
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3316
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75438 vs 22499
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 948 vs 643
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14631 vs 6931
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 June 2017 vs 6 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1076 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 vs 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 vs 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3316 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 vs 22499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 vs 643 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14631 vs 6931 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1475 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3316 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 | 22499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 | 643 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14631 | 6931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 10 | GP106 |
Launch date | 23 June 2017 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 172 | 394 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | |
Price now | $429.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1475 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1076 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 755.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.17 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.08 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 94.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 12500 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 201 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |