AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and AMD Radeon Pro 5300M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 4.4x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 100 GTexel/s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 8192 vs 1280
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98341 vs 29361
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 7730
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3595
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 858 vs 587
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14018 vs 5929
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 100 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98341 vs 29361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 vs 587 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14018 vs 5929 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 475 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98341 | 29361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 | 587 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14018 | 5929 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega 20 | Navi 14 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 13 Nov 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 184 | 369 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | 20 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | 3.200 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | 40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 100 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 6400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
