AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 947 MHz
  • 2906.3x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 6300
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 6300
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 775
  • Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 8313
Specifications (specs)
Launch date Dec 2019 vs 5 November 2013
Core clock speed 1574 MHz vs 947 MHz
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 8192 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14208 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14208 vs 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 vs 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3354
PassMark - G2D Mark 917 vs 775
PassMark - G3D Mark 15977 vs 8313

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

  • Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 475 Watt
  • 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 98432
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 275 Watt vs 475 Watt
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 102277 vs 98432

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
98432
102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14208
6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14208
6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3354
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
917
775
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15977
8313
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo AMD Radeon R9 290
Geekbench - OpenCL 98432 102277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14208 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14208 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3354
PassMark - G2D Mark 917 775
PassMark - G3D Mark 15977 8313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 540.645
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3683

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo AMD Radeon R9 290

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.1 GCN 2.0
Code name Vega 20 Hawaii
Launch date Dec 2019 5 November 2013
Place in performance rating 161 347
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1720 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1574 MHz 947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 14.09 TFLOPS
Pipelines 8192 2560
Pixel fill rate 110.1 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s 151.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 475 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 13230 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 4,849 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 825.3 GB/s 320.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 4096 bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1612 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio