AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 2906.3x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 6300
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 6300
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 775
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 8313
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 5 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 6300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 6300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 775 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 8313 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 98432
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 vs 98432 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 | 102277 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 6300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 6300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 775 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 8313 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Hawaii |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 5 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 161 | 347 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 947 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 320.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio |