AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 705 MHz
- Around 96% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 1302.7x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- Around 42% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 2x 2880
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 12 GB
- 230.3x more memory clock speed: 1612 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98389 vs 22732
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 8124
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 8124
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2413
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2226
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2226
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 656
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 8987
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 28 May 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 705 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 2x 2880 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 vs 22732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 656 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 8987 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 375 Watt vs 475 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 | 22732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 656 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 8987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Kepler |
| Code name | Vega 20 | GK110B |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 28 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 160 | 395 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Price now | $1,580 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 2x 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 5760 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
