AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1316 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1569 MHz
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 279.4 GTexel/s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 16 GB
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98389 vs 41715
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1316 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1569 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 279.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 vs 41715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 14208
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 14208
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 475 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 14208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 14208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 | 41715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 15910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 15910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| Code name | Vega 20 | GP104 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 160 | 291 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1569 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1316 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 279.4 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | 139.7 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | 8.940 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | 111.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 279.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 7200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 230.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
