AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 8192 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99246 vs 86219
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 858 vs 561
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14018 vs 13468
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 3072 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99246 vs 86219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 vs 561 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14018 vs 13468 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- 5.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 14208
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 14208
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 475 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 14208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 14208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99246 | 86219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 | 561 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14018 | 13468 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
| Code name | Vega 20 | TU104 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 179 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 259.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.59 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
IntelArc A530M
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
