AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 5.2x more core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99395 vs 22421
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 8870
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 8870
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 748 vs 585
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15597 vs 4809
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 14 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99395 vs 22421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 8870 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 vs 585 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15597 vs 4809 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 49% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3586 vs 3100
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3586 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99395 | 22421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 | 585 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15597 | 4809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Vega 12 |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 14 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 181 | 367 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |