AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 26.3x lower typical power consumption: 475 Watt vs 12500 million
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 53445
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 11925
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 11925
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 11300
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 19 March 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt vs 12500 million |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 vs 53445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 11925 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 vs 11300 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3100
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3100
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 2813
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 2813
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 768
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 2813 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 768 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 | 53445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 10411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 784 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 | 11300 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | Vega 20 | Greenland |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 19 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 166 | 228 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 499.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 13230 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |