AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1500 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99531 vs 61464
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 12929
Specifications (specs)
Launch date Dec 2019 vs 22 February 2019
Core clock speed 1574 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 99531 vs 61464
PassMark - G3D Mark 15475 vs 12929

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1720 MHz
  • 4x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 475 Watt
  • 7.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 16149
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 16149
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3100
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3100
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2813
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2813
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 768
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1720 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 120 Watt vs 475 Watt
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16952 vs 16149
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16952 vs 16149
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 2813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 2813
PassMark - G2D Mark 813 vs 768

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
99531
61464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16149
16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16149
16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3100
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3100
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2813
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2813
3355
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
768
813
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15475
12929
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega II NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL 99531 61464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16149 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16149 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3100 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3100 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2813 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2813 3355
PassMark - G2D Mark 768 813
PassMark - G3D Mark 15475 12929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 208.608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2573.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 145.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 926.614
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6262

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.1 Turing
Code name Vega 20 TU116
Launch date Dec 2019 22 February 2019
Place in performance rating 166 200
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $279
Price now $279.99
Value for money (0-100) 67.32

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1720 MHz 1770 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1574 MHz 1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 14.09 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4096
Pixel fill rate 110.1 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 475 Watt 120 Watt
Transistor count 13230 million 6,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 1
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Length 229 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bandwidth 825.3 GB/s
Memory bus width 4096 bit
Memory clock speed 1612 MHz 12000 MHz
Memory type HBM2

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)