AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99531 vs 61464
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 12929
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 22 February 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99531 vs 61464 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 vs 12929 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1720 MHz
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 16149
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 16149
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2813
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 768
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1720 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2813 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 vs 768 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99531 | 61464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 3355 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 813 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 | 12929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6262 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
Code name | Vega 20 | TU116 |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 166 | 200 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |