AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 1375x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 63.74
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1177.395
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 5.685
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 69.23
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 343.81
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 7988
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 7988
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 31 January 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 7988 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3463
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 31 January 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $449 |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 527 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
