AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1919.95
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 94.964
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 492.867
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 492.867 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s
- Around 9% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1408
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 130.7
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 13.641
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3463
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s vs 123.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 vs 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 vs 13.641 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8604 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52065 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4918 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 340 | 338 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | 128.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.202 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
