AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 89.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1250 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 63.74
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 1177.395
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 5.685
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 69.23
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 343.81
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 7988
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 7988
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 31 January 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 7988 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1408
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3463
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1408 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 31 January 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $449 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 527 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,867 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
