AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 320.8x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 10 July 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.9x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1408
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 174.714 vs 130.7
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 2361.73
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.305 vs 13.641
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 135.462
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 774.974
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 12184
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 3463
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 12184
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 vs 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 vs 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 vs 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 vs 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 3924.968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 17.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1226.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12844 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 10 July 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $1,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 196 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
