AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 121.124
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1958.592
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 8.452
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 120.742
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 510.941
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1676
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1676
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 10 June 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 121.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1958.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 8.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 120.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 510.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 1676 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3463
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 121.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1958.592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 8.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 120.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 510.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 1676 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 10 June 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 324 | 307 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | 119.4 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 59.72 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 201 mm (7.9") |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 160 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIFireGL V7600
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDFireStream 9170
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
