AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 1265.9x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 7400
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 7400
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 14 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 vs 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 vs 7400 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82941 vs 45574
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82941 vs 45574 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 7400 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45574 | 82941 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4149 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 14 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 406 | 409 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 176 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro W8000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDRadeon RX 570
