AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 705 MHz
Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 876 MHz
377.5x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
4.4x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 375 Watt
214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2413
Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2413
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2226
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2226
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 8124
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 8124
2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45563 vs 22732

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 28 May 2014
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 705 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz vs 876 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 375 Watt
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9943 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9943 vs 8124
Geekbench - OpenCL	45563 vs 22732

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

4.1x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1408
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB

Pipelines	2x 2880 vs 1408
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2413

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2413

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

2226

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

2226

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

8124

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

8124

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

45563

22732

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	2413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	2226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9943	8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9943	8124
Geekbench - OpenCL	45563	22732
PassMark - G3D Mark		8942
PassMark - G2D Mark		650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		309.857
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		17055

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Navi 14	GK110B
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	28 May 2014
Place in performance rating	404	401
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,999
Price now		$1,580
Value for money (0-100)		6.46
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	876 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	705 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	2x 2880
Pixel fill rate	46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s	338 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	375 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	7,080 million
CUDA cores		5760
Floating-point performance		2x 5,046 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 8-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	672 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA