AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD Radeon R7 370

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD Radeon R7 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 975 MHz
2044.9x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 110 Watt
Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 975 MHz
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 7102
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 7102

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1408 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 110 Watt
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 975 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9943 vs 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9943 vs 7102

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 45538

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3356
Geekbench - OpenCL	86561 vs 45538

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

7102

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9943

7102

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

45538

86561

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	AMD Radeon R7 370
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9943	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9943	7102
Geekbench - OpenCL	45538	86561
PassMark - G3D Mark		4499
PassMark - G2D Mark		608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		359.237
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1499

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5500M	AMD Radeon R7 370
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Navi 14	Trinidad
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	409	412
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	975 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	1024
Pixel fill rate	46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.6 GTexel/s	62.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	110 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	2,800 million
Floating-point performance		1,997 gflops
Stream Processors		1024
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		152 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	179.2 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	975 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)