AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 680.5x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45724 vs 23870
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 19 February 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 837 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 vs 23870 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Around 91% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 1408
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 9943
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 9943
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 vs 9943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 vs 9943 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 10176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 10176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 | 23870 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 14 | GK110 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 19 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 428 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $2,054.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 876 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 837 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2688 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 187.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |