AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 729 vs 332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 vs 332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8202 vs 7351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8202 vs 7351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 332 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 8202 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 331 | 329 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 175.0 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | 11.20 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 77.76 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 175.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 10800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDFireStream 9250
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
IntelArc A370M
