AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 8x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 3274
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 3274
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 818 vs 444
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 2428
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 vs 444 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 2428 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 205 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 | 444 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 2428 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.896 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 486.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 100.658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2524 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Navi 10 | Lexa |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 294 | 813 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | 10 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 86.56 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 17.31 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 2200 million |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 6.6" (168 mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Height | Half Height | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
ATIRadeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
ATIFireGL V7600
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480M
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
