AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 17.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 915 vs 827
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15038 vs 13709
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 23 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 915 vs 827 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15038 vs 13709 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 377.6 GTexel/s vs 277.9 GTexel/s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75438 vs 69982
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13123 vs 11065
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13123 vs 11065
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s vs 277.9 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 vs 69982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 915 | 827 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15038 | 13709 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69982 | 75438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 13123 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 23 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 201 | 199 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1475 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 755.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 24.17 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | 12.08 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 94.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 377.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 12500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |