AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 417
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15222 vs 9791
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69136 vs 59513
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 6 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 417 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 vs 9791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69136 vs 59513 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15485 vs 11065
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15485 vs 11065
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 417 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | 9791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69136 | 59513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 15485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 15485 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 809.639 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5596 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 6 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 194 | 248 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |