AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 8.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85879 vs 70273
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 11065
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 11065
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85879 vs 70273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 902 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14804 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70273 | 85879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 20206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $899 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 207 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |