AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 8.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85558 vs 69319
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 11065
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 11065
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85558 vs 69319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 11065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15222 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69319 | 85558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 20206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $899 |
| Place in performance rating | 194 | 195 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5700 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
