AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 820
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 16147
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 820 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 16147 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 205 Watt
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87875 vs 43810
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 16573
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 16573
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87875 vs 43810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 16573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 16573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 87875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 820 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 16147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8850 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 17 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 149 | 145 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 229 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
