AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 171.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 vs 20611
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 8917
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 7929
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 vs 20611
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 8917
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 7929
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 171.0 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 vs 20611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 8917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 7929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 vs 20611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 8917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 7929 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
- 2.1x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1792
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1792 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15383 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 947 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 20611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 8917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 7929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 20611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 8917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 7929 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 23 | GA106 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 63 | 117 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1425 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 171.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 10.94 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 68.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 171.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |