AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1825 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 2250 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 vs 17213
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3714
- 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3350
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 vs 17213
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3714
- 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 2250 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1792
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26791 vs 15596
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 vs 983
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 164043 vs 72837
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 270.025
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 20.735
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 135.303
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1054.582
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26791 vs 15596 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 vs 983 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 164043 vs 72837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 270.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 20.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 135.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1054.582 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15596 | 26791 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 983 | 1047 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72837 | 164043 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 320.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 2566.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20957 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 65 | 76 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 80 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Triple-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |