AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4980.223 vs 661.977
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.303 vs 129.036
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3718
- 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3359
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3718
- 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 vs 661.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 vs 129.036 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
- 5.7x more pipelines: 10240 vs 1792
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 15383
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 947
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 73128
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 485.179 vs 270.025
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.472 vs 20.735
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.001 vs 1054.582
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 20826
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 20826
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10240 vs 1792 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 vs 15383 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 947 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 73128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 vs 270.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 vs 20.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 vs 1054.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 20826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 20826 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15383 | 26935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 947 | 1088 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73128 | 209081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 485.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | 661.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 60.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 129.036 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 2441.001 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 34770 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 34770 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 23 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $1199 |
| Place in performance rating | 63 | 60 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 34.10 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 10240 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIAA10G
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon Pro W6600 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7600
