AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.9x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 144.1x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 10141
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 10141
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10806 vs 8299
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 26 April 2016
Boost clock speed 2903 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15257 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15257 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3713
PassMark - G3D Mark 10806 vs 8299

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

  • 4.6x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 1792
  • 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3358
  • 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3358
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 760
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2x 4096 vs 1792
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 38251 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 38251 vs 3358
PassMark - G2D Mark 787 vs 760

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
38251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
38251
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
760
787
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10806
8299
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6600M AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15257 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15257 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 38251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 38251
PassMark - G2D Mark 760 787
PassMark - G3D Mark 10806 8299
Geekbench - OpenCL 55512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 799.933
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Navi 23 Capsaicin
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 26 April 2016
Place in performance rating 194 192
Design reference
Launch price (MSRP) $1,499
Price now $849
Type Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 17.05

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2903 MHz 1000 MHz
Compute units 28 128
Core clock speed 2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.40 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 2x 4096
Pixel fill rate 185.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 350 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 8,900 million
Floating-point performance 2x 8,192 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 3x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 277 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 DirectX® 12
OpenCL 2.1 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 512 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 2x 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 500 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)

Technologies

AppAcceleration
CrossFire
Enduro
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
ZeroCore