AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.9x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 144.1x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 10141
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 10141
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10806 vs 8299
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10806 vs 8299 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 4.6x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 1792
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3358
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3358
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 760
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 1792 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 vs 760 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 38251 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 760 | 787 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10806 | 8299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 26 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 194 | 192 |
Design | reference | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $849 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 277 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |