AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 11616
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 11616
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 760 vs 652
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10806 vs 7514
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 3 April 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 11616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 760 vs 652 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10806 vs 7514 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4909 vs 3716
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4909 vs 3716
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 3358
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 4909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 4909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 18294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 18294 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 760 | 652 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10806 | 7514 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 23 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 3 April 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 194 | 193 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | 36 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VR Ready | ||
