AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon RX 580X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 11616
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 11616
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 842 vs 752
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11524 vs 6769
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 3 April 2018 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 11616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 842 vs 752 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11524 vs 6769 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4909 vs 3716
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4909 vs 3716
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 3358
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 580X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 11616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 4909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 18294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 18294 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 842 | 752 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11524 | 6769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon RX 580X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 3 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 182 | 187 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 36 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VR Ready |