AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 58
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1792
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 15257
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 15257
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1792 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 15257 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 58 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 842 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11524 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 182 | 183 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 9.585 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAL4
