AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 885 MHz
  • 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1185 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 475
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed 2200 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed 2903 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 797 vs 475

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

  • Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 15257
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 15257
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3716
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3716
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3358
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3358
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11646 vs 9522
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2304 vs 1792
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17328 vs 15257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17328 vs 15257
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8055 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8055 vs 3358
PassMark - G3D Mark 11646 vs 9522

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15257
17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
8055
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
797
475
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9522
11646
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6600M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15257 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15257 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 8055
PassMark - G2D Mark 797 475
PassMark - G3D Mark 9522 11646
Geekbench - OpenCL 76023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1001.496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6809

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Code name Navi 23 TU106
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 29 January 2019
Place in performance rating 187 190
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2903 MHz 1185 MHz
Compute units 28
Core clock speed 2200 MHz 885 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.40 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 2304
Pixel fill rate 185.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 10,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6