AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 885 MHz
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 474
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 474 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 15257
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 15257
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3358
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3358
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11629 vs 9522
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11629 vs 9522 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 8055 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 474 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9522 | 11629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76080 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 188 | 190 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1185 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
