AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1470 MHz
  • Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 2507 MHz vs 1650 MHz
  • Around 76% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2176
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 936 vs 859
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19881 vs 16573
  • Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131707 vs 87035
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 2 July 2019
Core clock speed 2075 MHz vs 1470 MHz
Boost clock speed 2507 MHz vs 1650 MHz
Pipelines 3840 vs 2176
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 936 vs 859
PassMark - G3D Mark 19881 vs 16573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20988 vs 20969
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20988 vs 20969
Geekbench - OpenCL 131707 vs 87035

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 450 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 3717
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 3717
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 3357
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 175 Watt vs 450 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5567 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5567 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 5026 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 5026 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
936
859
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19881
16573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20988
20969
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20988
20969
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
5567
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
5567
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
5026
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
5026
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
131707
87035
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark 936 859
PassMark - G3D Mark 19881 16573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20988 20969
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20988 20969
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 5567
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 5567
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 5026
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 5026
Geekbench - OpenCL 131707 87035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 246.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3885.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 27.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 165.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1271.757
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Code name Navi 21 TU106
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 2 July 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $2249 $399
Place in performance rating 108 145
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2507 MHz 1650 MHz
Compute units 60
Core clock speed 2075 MHz 1470 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1203 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 38.51 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 19.25 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3840 2176
Pixel fill rate 240.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 601.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 450 Watt 175 Watt
Transistor count 26800 million 10.8 B
CUDA cores 2176
Maximum GPU temperature 89 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 6x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Height 50 mm (2 inches) 4.435” (112.6mm)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches) 9.0” (228.60mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 8 pin
Width 120 mm (4.7 inches) 2-Slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready