AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 47400x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 120x more pipelines: 3840 vs 32
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 80 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 13 March 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 32 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
- 13.8x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 400 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 270 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Navi 21 | G84 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 13 March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
Place in performance rating | 497 | 493 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 80 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 32 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 289 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Quad-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR2?, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |