AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 5122.1x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2786 vs 2045
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2786 vs 2045
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 125290 vs 26950
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 23 November 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 vs 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 vs 2045 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 vs 26950 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3144 vs 2243
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3144 vs 2243
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3144 vs 2243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3144 vs 2243 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon R9 M295X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | 2045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | 3144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | 3144 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 | 26950 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5150 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 820.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 386.418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | AMD Radeon R9 M295X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 23 November 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
Place in performance rating | 496 | 499 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Quad-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | Not Listed |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |