AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 723 MHz
  • 5122.1x more texture fill rate: 474.0 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
  • Around 88% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2048
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2786 vs 2045
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2786 vs 2045
  • 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 125290 vs 26865
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 Aug 2021 vs 23 November 2014
Core clock speed 1800 MHz vs 723 MHz
Texture fill rate 474.0 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3840 vs 2048
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2786 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2786 vs 2045
Geekbench - OpenCL 125290 vs 26865

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X

  • Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 400 Watt
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3144 vs 2243
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3144 vs 2243
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 400 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3144 vs 2243
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3144 vs 2243

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2786
2045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2786
2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2243
3144
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2243
3144
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
125290
26865
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo AMD Radeon R9 M295X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2786 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2786 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2243 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2243 3144
Geekbench - OpenCL 125290 26865
PassMark - G3D Mark 5150
PassMark - G2D Mark 832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 386.418

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Navi 21 Amethyst
Launch date 3 Aug 2021 23 November 2014
Launch price (MSRP) $4999
Place in performance rating 495 498
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1975 MHz
Compute units 60
Core clock speed 1800 MHz 723 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 15.17 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3840 2048
Pixel fill rate 189.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 474.0 GTexel/s 92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 400 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 26800 million 5,000 million
Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 800 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width Quad-slot
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.2 Not Listed
OpenCL 2.1 Not Listed
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6 Not Listed
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore