AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon Pro 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X and AMD Radeon Pro 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 1105 MHz
- 4446.4x more texture fill rate: 498.0 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 2340
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 2340
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123773 vs 30250
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 5 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2075 MHz vs 1105 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s vs 112.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123773 vs 30250 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | AMD Radeon Pro 570 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123773 | 30250 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 431 | 432 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2075 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 996.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 31.87 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.94 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 199.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s | 112.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 217.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 6800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |