AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 837 MHz
  • 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2075 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • 2656x more texture fill rate: 498.0 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2688
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB
  • 333.3x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 6.0 GB/s
  • 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 122443 vs 23870
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 Aug 2021 vs 19 February 2013
Core clock speed 1800 MHz vs 837 MHz
Boost clock speed 2075 MHz vs 876 MHz
Texture fill rate 498.0 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec
Pipelines 3840 vs 2688
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3356
Geekbench - OpenCL 122443 vs 23870

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

  • Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 400 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 400 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3723
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3723
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3356
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
122443
23870
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6800X NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 3356
Geekbench - OpenCL 122443 23870
PassMark - G3D Mark 8190
PassMark - G2D Mark 630
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10176
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2901

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Kepler
Code name Navi 21 GK110
Launch date 3 Aug 2021 19 February 2013
Place in performance rating 427 428
Type Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $2,054.59
Value for money (0-100) 5.09

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2075 MHz 876 MHz
Compute units 60
Core clock speed 1800 MHz 837 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 996.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 31.87 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 15.94 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3840 2688
Pixel fill rate 199.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 498.0 GTexel/s 187.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 400 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 26800 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 2688
Floating-point performance 4,709 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches) 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 800 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Width Quad-slot
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 6.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA