AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2559.5x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 24 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 300 W
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3739
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3739
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt vs 300 W |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3739 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3739 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 8925 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9576 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8673 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8673 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Fiji |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 24 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 232 | 235 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Quad-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 191 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |