AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 2689.6x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2432
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 55390
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3739 vs 3638
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3739 vs 3638
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 2 November 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2432 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 55390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 vs 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 vs 3638 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 300 W
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 300 W |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 55390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 3638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 3638 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14687 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 2 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 239 | 236 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 2432 |
| Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Quad-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6900X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
