AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 712 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 10.2x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 50643
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 712 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 50643 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 W
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3739
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3739
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 3 Aug 2021 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 W |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3739 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3739 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 50643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 8923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 8923 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6841 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4926 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GA107 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 239 | 241 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1057 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 712 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | 4.329 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | 42.28 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 67.65 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Quad-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6900X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
