AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1405 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 1812x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 72404
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3739 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3739 vs 3686
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 6 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 72404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 vs 3686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 W
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 W |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 72404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 3686 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2375 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 21 | GP102 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 6 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 232 | 229 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Price now | $1,200 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Quad-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 11408 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |