AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 528.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3641 vs 984
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17712 vs 5079
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5431 vs 1579
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5431 vs 1579
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 1 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 528.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3641 vs 984 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17712 vs 5079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 vs 1579 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 634
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 vs 1123
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3178 vs 2678
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 vs 1123
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3178 vs 2678
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3178 vs 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3178 vs 2678 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | AMD Radeon HD 8690M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3641 | 984 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17712 | 5079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 | 3178 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | AMD Radeon HD 8690M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Sun |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 1 March 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 623 | 625 |
Price now | $259.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 775 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 528.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 16.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |